Chapter1 Introduction: Modeling Linearization
1.1 Overview
1.2 Empirical Domain: Linearization of Verbal Dependents in English and Japanese
1.2.1 Heavy NP Shift in English
1.2.2 Short-Scrambling in Japanese
1.2.3 Summary of Major Empirical Findings
1.3 Theoretical Background and Assumptions
1.3.1 The Model of the Grammar
1.3.2 Linearization under the Prosodic Phase Hypothesis
1.3.3 A Division of Labor between Grammatical Components
1.4 Chapter Organization
Appendix Linearization in Other Grammatical Models
Chapter2 The Prosodic Phase Hypothesis
2.1 The Architecture of the Language Faculty
2.2 Building Syntactic Objects
2.2.1 The Mechanism of Left-to-Right Structure-Building
2.2.1.1 The Structure-Building Operation
2.2.1.2 The Direction of Structure-Building
2.2.1.3 The Course of Structure-Building
2.2.2 Moti ating Left-to-Right Structure-Building
2.3 Building Prosodic Objects
2.4 Pairing Syntactic Objects and Prosodic Objects
2.4.1 Operational Definitions of Semantic-Pragmatic Notions
2.4.1.1 The Feature [Focus]
2.4.1.2 Broad-Focus
2.4.1.3 Narrow-Focus
2.4.1.4 Summary
2.4.2 Broad-Focus Sentences with Default Sentence Stress
2.4.2.1 General Mapping Algorithm
2.4.2.2 English
2.4.2.3 Japanese
2.4.3 Narrow-Focus Sentences with Focal Stress
2.4.3.1 Mapping Constraints for [Focus]
2.4.3.2 English
2.4.3.3 Japanese
2.4.4 Summary: A Parallel Derivational Approach to Prosodic Structure
2.5 Interface Levels
2.5.1 PF Interface
2.5.2 LF Interface
Chapter3 Linearization of Verbal Dependents in English
3.1 Prosodic Properties of Linearization in the Verbal Domain
3.1.1 Overview
3.1.2 Broad-Focus Sentences
3.1.2.1 Default Sentence Stress
3.1.2.2 The Distinction between Canonical and Marked Orders
3.1.2.3 Derivations
3.1.3 Narrow-Focus Sentences
3.1.3.1 Focal Stress and the Prosodic Weight Effect
3.1.3.2 Derivations
3.1.4 Residue: Unexpected Results of the Elicitation
3.2 More on the Distinction between Canonical and Marked Orders
3.2.1 The Prosodic Weight Condition and Processing Efficiency
3.2.2 The Prosodic Markedness Effect and Performance Frequency
3.3 Deriving the Properties of the Marked Order
3.3.1 Arguments for the Prosodic Weight Condition
3.3.1.1 More on the Right-Edge Heaviness Effect in XP-Shift
3.3.1.1.1 CP/IP-Shift
3.3.1.1.2 Non-DP-Shift
3.3.1.1.3 DP-Shift with Preposition-Stranding
3.3.1.2 Locality of XP-Shift
3.3.2 Arguments for Incremental Structure-Building in the Syntax
3.3.2.1 Syntactic Constituency Tests
3.3.2.1.1 Coordination Test
3.3.2.1.2 Ellipsis Test
3.3.2.2 Right-Branching Structure and LF Effects
3.3.2.2.1 Interpretation of the Shifted XP
3.3.2.2.2 LF Effects
3.4 Situating the Prosodic Phase Hypothesis in Previous Analyses of XP-Shift
3.4.1 Movement Approaches
3.4.1.1 Phonologically Based Movement
3.4.1.1.1 Stylistic Rule: Ross (1967/86) and Rochemont (1978/85)
3.4.1.1.2 Prosodically-Motivated Movement: Zubizarreta (1998)
3.4.1.2 Syntactic Movement
3.4.1.2.1 Rightward Movement: Gueron (1980) and Rochemont and Culicover (1990)
3.4.1.2.2 Leftward Movement: Larson (1989) and Kayne (1994)
3.4.1.2.3 Leftward Movement and Phonological Deletion: Takano (1998)
3.4.2 Base-Generation Approaches
3.4.3 Summary
Appendix Elicitation of English Data
Chapter 4 Linearization of Verbal Dependents in Japanese
4.1 Prosodic Properties of Linearization in the Verbal Domain
4.1.1 Overview
4.1.2 Broad-Focus Sentences
4.1.2.1 Default Sentence Stress
4.1.2.2 Absence of the Distinction between Canonical and Marked Orders
4.1.2.3 Derivations
4.1.3 Narrow-Focus Sentences
4.1.3.1 Avoidance of Focal Stress and the Prosodic Economy Effect
4.1.3.2 Derivations
4.1.4 Residue: Unexpected Results of the Elicitation
4.2 More on the Absence of the Distinction between Canonical and Marked Orders
4.2.1 The Prosodic Economy Condition and Production Efficiency
4.2.2 Absence of the Prosodic Markedness Effect and Case Morphology
4.3 Deriving the Properties of Order-II
4.3.1 Arguments for the Prosodic Economy Condition for Japanese
4.3.1.1 More on the Absence of a Prosodic Weight Effect in XP-Scrambling
4.3.1.2 Locality of XP-Scrambling
4.3.2 Arguments for Incremental Structure-Building in the Syntax
4.3.2.1 Syntactic Constituency Tests
4.3.2.1.1 Coordination Test
4.3.2.1.2 Ellipsis Test
4.3.2.2 Base-Generation and LF Effects
4.3.2.2.1 Interpretation of the Scrambled XP
4.3.2.2.2 LF Effects
4.4 Situating the Prosodic Phase Hypothesis in Pre ious Analyses of XP-Scrambling
4.4.1 Movement Approaches
4.4.1.1 Phonological Movement: Ross (1967/86)
4.4.1.2 Syntactic Movement
4.4.1.2.1 Leftward Movement: Minimalist Approaches
4.4.1.2.2 LF-Lowering: Boskovic and Takahashi (1998)
4.4.2 Base-Generation Approaches
4.4.3 Summary
Appendix Elicitation of Japanese Data
Chapter5 Implications and Conclusions
5.1 Summary
5.1.1 Summary from a Typological Perspective
5.1.1.1 Syntax-Prosody Mapping Algorithm
5.1.1.2 Generalizations about Linearization of Verbal Dependents
5.1.2 Theoretical Significance of the Prosodic Phase Hypothesis
5.1.2.1 Determining Linearization
5.1.2.2 A Division of Labor between Syntax and Prosody
5.1.2.3 The Role of Prosodic Domains in Defining Phonological Processes
5.2 Implications and Further Issues: The Lexical Accent Parameter
5.2.1 Typological Picture
5.2.2 A Test Case: German and Dutch
5.3 Final Remarks
5.3.1 Beyond the Limits of Syntax
5.3.2 Beyond the Limits of Linguistic Cognitive System